Understanding and tolerance

It happened a few minutes, I think that in fact the performance of the two main characters of men and women were still decent, though this in itself is a shameful thing. This indicates that he does sound absurd, generally speaking, this incident is itself a scandal on the family spread, is interrupted by a public television activities, sabotage, and to the general public to be judged by secular point of view, the two main characters are all committed mistakes. However, in the wrong around us, we can not find a good manners Wei Chang. Mr. Zhang Bin appear restrained, though embarrassed, but his performance is, I think the spot is at least reduced (or no increase) rather than increasing the extent of his loss of face. If Mr. Zhang did not like his performance as the spot, while the other measures taken, for example, leave to evade rather than confront his wife and everybody, for example, showing a little rude to his wife's attitude, it will be his own even more dangerous place situation. Ms Aw's it? Despite the cries that she has to break away, but are required to express her anger were still appropriate and in a within the limits of civilization. A just found out her husband for their infidelity, has decided to expose her husband before television cameras and the angry woman, in the incident also showed such grace, what else can we do? My conclusion is that the process of the incident, Mr. Zhang Bin with the Miss Hu Ziwei the couple were still have very good people - of course, some people would say that Ms Wu did not trouble the market is the performance of self-cultivation, then I can accept this kinds of argument, modified into a bustling market in itself, inter alia, the two events in the disgraceful performance of civilization, all well, at least for many couples to avoid the kind of noise in public places - violence, rude language, hideous face -- - at least not these.


Ms Wu in the state after her husband's infidelity, mentioned several times that the Olympic Games, as well as in her words, a passage from a French foreign minister. This condemnation of her husband, the way I do not agree, do not support the cause and I am opposed to others, the state, collective, social perspective to criticize like her. Olympic Games, as well as the "French Foreign Minister" of the mouth of a country's values formation, belong to all social issues, the total amount of these heavy topics should not be down on one person. This point of view, ways to condemn, or expect to make others to condemn her husband, are inappropriate, in my opinion. That took place between husband and wife problems, relative both sides of these two individuals is husbands and wives should not attempt to pull the community and the community joined. Because the incident took place in front of TV, which would let the incident become a special, but I think that although they are not specific complex, since the events on television show actually only two parties: the party with her husband, Zhang Bin's wife Hu Ziwei, this on the one hand, the other party that we - all of the community at large, as a spectator. State, CCTV may be considered is also involved in the event the other party or parties; However, from a fundamental understanding, they are not. China Central Television to the State, the State in fact is our own community, country or China Central Television to Ms Aw, Mr. Zhang to make any response, it is not only on behalf of our community's response - of course, representatives of a reaction does not mean that the community's response to both of them want to do the actual response. As a spectator we are at the same time as the incident two Fang party, we are strong in our community in front of Ms Wu and Mr Zhang is a tiny powerless. As a strong, powerful person, should not even be tolerant and understand? It is too easy to hurt the weak, and often can not hurt to make aware of the extent of injury. However, it seems that this time, no matter how much the public's tolerance, and the couple can not be changed, in particular Ms Aw to face the consequences of possible severe penalties. The exercise of power by the representatives of the people there might be inertia, but in the end is that the people leading direction, tolerance will be the greatest strength of our community.